Energy Options for the US
The topic of “energy independence” seems to always be tied to political motivations that behind that seem to be tied to isolationism. Kind of like if we stop having to talk to the people that are causing a headache for us we will not have our headache any longer. I never really like this bury your head in the sand mentatlity. I think what our country should focus on are “energy options” instead. My opinion is that over the next 15 to 20 years having fuel flexibility is what is going to provide security and economic development for the US and for the remainder of the world for that matter. Oil, natural gas, coal, solar, wind, and the myriad of biofuels all have to be options for us. Different fuels provide the flexibility we need to handle pollution, price fluxuations, etc.
This article http://seekingalpha.com/article/69659-recession-i-ve-got-a-solution talks about why development of a liquified coal plant to produce jet fuel is a good idea. He even takes it one further by pointing out how an investment in this could provide for a boost in our trade deficit. There are many other point here also.
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
-
Recent
- What I Learned Yesterday 12
- What I Learned Yesterday 11
- What I Learned Yesterday 10
- What I Learned Yesterday 9
- Energy Options for the US
- What I Learned Yesterday 8
- What I Learned Yesterday 7
- What I Learned Yesterday 6
- Finding out the mapper can do what I want it to do
- Some XSLT for when you just can’t get the mapper to do what you want it to do
- What I learned yesterday 5
- What I Learned Yesterday 4
-
Links
-
Archives
- May 2008 (2)
- April 2008 (2)
- March 2008 (3)
- February 2008 (3)
- January 2008 (5)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS